Introduction
The sport of football is able to be described as the most thrilling and exciting form of sports ever played, thanks to its many opportunities, strategies which allow you to win even when facing tough opponents and the amazing teamwork. But, football games aren’t just about teamwork, but also about a fierce competition, and the significance of a decisive goal in the last minute that can make the difference between winning and losing.
There are a myriad of disputes about whether the goal actually been achieved, so the choice of the referee could not be the most effective solution to the issue. Therefore, the need for the development of a more precise method for determining the fact of goal becomes apparent to be a concern, and could raise questions about the validity of referees’ aid during matches in the event that the technology proves to be reliable and even reliable.
While goals-line technology (GLT) will likely to become the most accurate tool to determine what constitutes the fact in scoring or not scoring, it could be a risk to an immediate threat to the authority of referees , and consequently, be an inappropriate device to be used in football.
Concerning the Essential Requirements
Based on the current scenario according to the current situation, the A-League isn’t using the GLT method at the moment but this doesn’t stop the referee from rendering an accurate decision regarding the outcome of the match. As the video sequence provided by IceColdClarky illustrates in 1 even with the ball almost touching the net, and even reaching the target it was still possible to establish whether it was scored.
But, based on the fundamental idea GLT assumes using GLT will resolve a variety of issues that are encountered during an course games. For example, Goal-line technology (GLT) specifications(n.d.) claim the following “The goal-line technology only appears at the goal line and solely to determine if it has been achieved or it has not.” 2
As of now, the GLT system is still a concept, but it is expected to become reality very soon, since the tests have already begun and there have been some results given regarding the question of using the GLT and its reliability. Although these results are thought to be positive in the moment, there’s likely to be a sequence of tests that are required either to verify the GLT usefulness or to halt the implementation of the new technology for the better.
According to Harold’s comments, Harold states, “The International Football Association Board (IFAB) The body that implements rules, is currently conducting a new test to determine what technologies are suitable to be introduced into football 3.” This implies that the GLT isn’t the only option referees have to back up their decisions about the goals and winners.
GLT and FIFA as well as the GLT The GLT and FIFA
Although the GLT device hasn’t been examined yet and only allows to speculate on the outcomes of its use, FIFA seems to be likely to adopt the latest technologies in the near future. With the help of IFAB the new technology will be brought into the world of football, with a strong basis of “whether the goal was scored or not, to justify the decision of the referee” 4
In analyzing the arguments for encouraging the GLT technology in soccer, it’s important to remember the arguments that FIFA provided on the matter. In accordance with the requirements of the Association the GLT topic is only concerned with being able to determine how to determine the fact of scoring goals. 5
But, as per the AFL Commission and the reasons provided by a variety of opponents however, the GLT system is not without shortcomings. Based on that which it says in the AFL Commission says concerning the new technology, “video technology will not completely eliminate errors from the game because some replays can’t help however the goal is to make better decisions when feasible.” 6
Thus, the method of making use of the GLT device should be utilized only when the solution isn’t being clear. Actually employing GLT as a last resort of justice is logical because the technology requires the most precise calculations. However, the question remains what is the reason for not using the GLT device for the duration of the match.
FFA as well as GLT Issue Acceptance. GLT Issue Acceptance
It is also crucial to be aware of the position FFA is taking on the subject of the introduction of the GLT. In accordance with the standards set forth by FFA the GLT device should be precise, provide results within a minute and, as a further addition to the earlier requirement that it could “only be communicated to officials of the match (via the watch of the referee via vibration or visual signals)” 7 This leads to a further decrease in the concept of GLT use. GLT use.
Because the outcomes from the objective are likely to be communicated through something that is not as reliable like text message, they is easy to fake or substituted by a false message. Therefore, the validity of goal line technology is uncertain. Additionally, FFA also has its concerns regarding the introduction of the GLT system to football.
As per Lyall Gorman the head of the Hyundai A-League, “The FFA acknowledges that a significant part of the matchday experience is watching fans make good and bad choices. This is, according the Gorman that it is. Gorman part of the match day experience.” 8 So it is the fact that at some points the referees’ mistakes are able to be considered to be an integral part of the game, which provides extra excitement to both the fans and players.
On the other hand according to the data provided in the Goal-line technology (GLT) specifications, the mechanism of testing the results that the device will offer is very complicated and leaves very little room for potential for either cheating or addressing technical issues; in accordance with the Goal-line Technology (GLT) specification. 9
Discuss, “The GLT system must be able to operate autonomously and without interruption throughout the duration of the tests , without interference from the technology provider” 10. In addition to that fact that the GLT system demands that the test subject have a particular watch whose properties are expected to be in line with the requirements of certain standards, it can be said that the usage for this GLT technology is very secure and will provide reliable results.
Examining the viability of the Project
It is evident that the question of the use for the GLT is quite complex. On one hand, the recommendations offered by referees are often wrong. But, the ethical question that the GLT application touches is worth a serious look.
One of the biggest issues football teams could face is the worry that the public will see that GLT use as a reason for the bad performance is a major obstacle for everyone worried. According to the explanation provided by Iva Klasnic in Allen’s report “The funny aspect is the FA has declared that they support goal-line technology during half-time.
This is absurd, as they attempt to shield the bad performances by their official. It’s just a joke.” 11 Thus, the risk to the GLT devices will serve as a justification for the shortcomings of the players with the lowest success remains, and being echoed through one of them it is made more obvious.
Additionally, it is essential to remember that regardless of matter how technologically advanced it may be, there is still the possibility of making an error. As per the words of Garland, Malcolm and Rowe claim, “though the introduction of goal-line technology can decrease the likelihood of goals being unfairly awarded and disallowed evidence from Cyclops Cyclops indicates that technology is not completely reliable. 12.”
However currently, it appears to be the most reliable method of all available. According to former footballer, Lee Sharpe, explains that the technology is worth testing because at present, it’s the best method of defining what constitutes the fact of scoring goals: “If you take my system, there are eight cameras on each post, and eight cameras on the crossbar.
It gives you a clear image of the ball crossing the line precisely with the camera and there is no mistake. (It’s an) incredible technology.” 13Nevertheless it is evident it is likely that GLT devices will help in determining what constitutes the fact the goal is significantly more simple, and that means the GLT devices should be employed in the field of play as a proof of the fact of an objective.
So, the brand new technology can be regarded as a sporting innovation that could result in a more fair game and more precise evaluation of game outcomes.
Conclusion
When the goal-line technology is implemented in football and soccer, it will be possible to gather more precise data as well as provide more specific and accurate judgments about the score or not. This could be a crucial factor for the team. But the moral aspect of using the GLT must also be taken into consideration as a potential obstacle to the process of implementing this technology in the realm of football.
Additionally is it is the fact it is possible that the system behind the GLT may fail in its precision should be considered as a reason for be patient in introducing the GLT system to football. So, it is said that the technology of goal lines is among the latest innovations that modern football is based on, and will help in the game to be more fair and the decisions referees take more sensible.
With the aid of GLT technologies, corruption within the field of football is unlikely to occur according to the bits of evidence discussed above there are plenty of reasons to believe that GLT should be introduced to football. When football is made more open and honest, the players can enjoy pure competition with no elements of absurdity